The article is devoted to the development of methodological tools to address the problem of existence of the negative aspects of clustering. For this purpose, a special author’s technique and the system for monitoring the effectiveness of interaction between enterprises as part of the industrial cluster are developed. The advantages of the developed control system areits ease of use, speed of obtaining results of the evaluation, the availability of source data for the calculations, and the ability to use it not only for existing clusters, but also for projected clusters, which helps prevent the possible negative aspects of clustering. The authors also performed testing of the developed system for monitoring the effectiveness of interaction between enterprises within an existing industrial cluster as an example of the Volga Automobile Cluster of Russia and the planned metallurgical cluster in Russia.
cluster, enterprise, production, industry, system of control.
1. Gerasimov B.N., Gerasimov K.B. Proizvodstvennyj menedzhment [Production management]. - Moscow, Vuzovskijuchebnik: INFRA-M Publ., 2015. 312 p.
2. Gerasimov B.N., Gerasimov K.B. Upravlenie ekonomicheskimi sistemami [Management of economic systems]. Moscow, Vuzovskij uchebnik, INFRA-M Publ., 2016. - 225 p.
3. GerasimovK.B., Prosvirkin N.Y. Upravlenie innovaciyami [innovation Management]. Samara: SMIU Publ., 2011. - 124 p.
4. ProsvirkinN.Y. Management problems and prospects of economic development of industrial enterprises in the interaction in clusters. Sbornik statej vserossijskoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii”Molodyeuchenyevr esheniiaktualnyhproblemnauki” [Proc. All-Russia. Conf. “Young scientists in solving actual problems of science”]. Krasnoyarsk: SibGTU, 2010. - pp. 183-185. (In Russian).
5. ProsvirkinN.Y. Application methods for solving problems with many of the criteria for modeling the interaction between the companies in clusters // Problemy ehkonomiki finansov i upravleniya proizvodstvom [Problems of economics, finance and production management], 2013. vol.34. pp. 119-128 (in Russian).
6. Povolzhskij avtomobilnyj klaster [Volga automobile cluster] Available at: http://www.poria.ru/files/pak.pdf
7. Arag n, C., Aranguren, M.J., Iturrioz, C.,Wilson, J.R. A social capital approach for network policy learning: The case of an established cluster initiative. European Urban and Regional Studies, 2014, vol. 21 (2), pp. 128 (in Russian)
8. Emmoth, A., Gebert Persson, S., Lundberg, H. Interpartner Legitimacy Effects on Cluster Initiative Formation and Development Processes. European Planning Studies, 2015, vol. 23 (5), pp. 892-908 (in Russian).
9. Galli , E.-P., Glaser, A., M rindol, V., Weil, T. How Do Pre-existing R&D Activities in a Region Influence the Performance of Cluster Initiatives? The Case of French Competitiveness Clusters. European Planning Studies, 2013, vol. 21 (10), pp. 1653-1675 (in Russian).
10. Nica, M. Small business clusters in Oklahoma: Mar or Jacobs effects? Regional and Sectoral Economic Studies, 2010, vol. 10 (2), pp. 5-19 (in Russian).
11. Vanka, G.M., Heijman, W.J.M., Vasiljevic, Z. Present state analysis of cluster initiatives in Serbian transition economy. Agricultural Economics (Czech Republic), 2012, vol. 58 (12), pp. 566-579 (in Russian).
12. Xavier Molina-Morales, F.,Belso-Mart nez, J.A.,M s-Verd , F.,Mart nez-Ch fer, L. Formation and dissolution of interfirm linkages in lengthy and stable networks in clusters. Journal of Business Research, 2015, vol. 68 (7), pp. 1557- 1562 (in Russian).
